HHO gas part one (alternative to fossil fuels)

All the conspiracy junkies are in here along with people who actually fucking listened when their professors talked about thermodynamics. It's kind of funny to watch the former just gloss over the comments without reading them, believing instead that the government has been cheating them of a free energy source.

DIY Its work DoublerVoltage In12V to35V, out 24Vto 76V circuit fr. ElecFree com "search 12v to 24v dc to dc converter IC 40106, change BYWS1P1-200 to FT2000G n all the Capacitor into higher value, work very well together with PWM G Forrest Cook, all MosFeT using IRF250 w/Big Heat sink , 30Amp Max. for any HHO Cell thks ) NO MORe Limited 12V fr. yur Car Battery

Oops, you're right, sorry. It's all that "comment limit exceeded" bullcrap from youtube that's throwing me off. Going back and forth every TWO comments doing that stupid catcha thing is soooo annoying.
Sorry about that.

was that comment really ment for me cause i dont get the reason for such a reply

More heat is used to produce HHO than the HHO generates in heat.
You can't have a net gain, because that would break the laws of thermodynamics. It's a law of nature.
If these laws didn't work, the whole universe would fall apart.

Imagine if you could actually create energy. You *actually* think that's possible?
Perhaps you found the answer to where the big bang came from, because you just discarded a basic law of nature and showed that you can create energy.

Any person that understand science and the laws of nature will immediately toss this scam in the hoax bin.
Only ignorant fools and people that stand to gain from sales defend this lie.

liar!

WTF, 1:32, its H2O not HO2

hello there,,if you got a system like the one they show on this video,,can you tell me were you can buy it or the name of it,,,thanks and have a nice ,,bye

to the people that says this is not possible, stupid is as stupid does, i have a system like this and it works g back to school and get smart ass hole

More universities, professors and students need to get into this. Then create a publicly owned company that uses this technology. Keep it away from the government because they are really wolves in sheeps clothing and work for their Wall ST masters who back oil. We need to stop burning fossil fuel to power the electric grid. Our economy is based on fossil fuel. End that and we end their control over us.

soon it's gonna be up to all of us to change the world for the better

his name was Stanley Myer and yep the government DID kill him.

What people need to understand is that energy can not be created or destroyed, merely transformed.

In the case of this "HHO torch" electricity is used to split water into H2 and O2 (electrolysis). Then the H2 and O2 mixture is ignited to form heat.

Here is what I want to see:
This system creating the flame which is used to run a sterling engine connected to an alternator. Then you can compare the power going in to the power coming out.

I forgot his name but someone else invented this before him where he turns water into fuel through electrics but I think the government killed him because he was creating fuel from water and that would mean all the fuel companies would go bust.

This shit is for real. I've seen it.
Does it violate the 1st Law of Thermodynamics? Or is it merely highly efficient?
Small amounts of electricity are run through water and a gas is produced. That gas, when burned, produces more heat than could've been produced from the electricity alone, or so it is claimed.
It is this source of excess heat that could be revolutionary

Just because something is patented doesn't mean it works. People are skeptical because the process of exactly what goes on to produce HHO and how it works isn't nearly well enough explained. Scientifically speaking, everything is in doubt.

The problem is that these repeated experiments show it very very very very very very likely such a thing does not exist. That does not mean it is strictly impossible in the literal sense of the word, but it's damned not likely to happen. If you disagree then can you provide a proper experimental test that you can repeat again and again and again and again and get the same results every time with different labs, experimenters, etc.? This is basic scientific method.

Even if we suppose some sort of "exotic" effect exists that somehow adds more energy than just what is being pumped in via the electrolytic process it must be under the limit of detection via scientific instruments otherwise it would've rung up on every lab there is. Even if it was detected with a better instrument, the magnitude would render it useless for practical uses.

This is no better than simply trying to hook a motor and generator together and hope "perpetual motion" happens.

1. The problem is not that it "deviates from preconceived notions" but from what is KNOWN TO BE TRUE. One can PROVE, scientifically, that electrolyzing water can only store up as much energy as is delivered via the electricity and actually stores up less due to inefficiency. And that burning the resulting gases doesn't release any more than went in via the electricity and did the work.

2. You can get patents for lots of crap. Doesn't make it any less crap.

Yeah.. sad but true. We could be living in such a diffirent world if greed wasnt what motivated our leaders.

Tesla even could have done so much more but since wireless electricity wasnt as profitable as copper wiring GE put a stop to that!

And after all the facts… People still actually think that there is no other fuel than fossil fuels.

The Bohemian club sure are doing a good job manipulating their people haha ugh….

Stan Meyer (water car inventor) also initiated a deal with the government, and you know what his fate was the next day. They (oil companies & Bushes) cant give up their multi trillion dollar profit that easily can they? you think? In the end if oil runs out perhaps they will also try to control free energy lol….

what is your suggestion then master of the universe? since no ones opinion matters but yours

Super inefficient? we are getting it close to 85% efficient and there are idiots like you pushing gasoline along with the millionaires from the oil industry.

Why is it whenever someone creates something that deviates from a preconceived notion they instantly call it BS? Open your mind man, this is for real. This man has patented his process and even initiated a deal with the Govt. Why is this so hard to believe?