June 23, 2009
HHO gas part one (alternative to fossil fuels)
How to download this video: www.askyourpc.com HHO gas part one (alternative to fossil fuels) www.hytechapps.com Join the HHO community: hhoinfo.ning.com Also check out my website www.wallpapersearch.net
Tags: hho conversion guide, hho generator plans, hho gas, hho generator blueprint
Filed under HHO Videos by HHO Convert




Comments on HHO gas part one (alternative to fossil fuels)
v2daizzza @ 7:56 am
HHO gas? Like H2O steam? lolol
tdmarkley @ 7:56 am
This generator works Great and will revolutionize industrial applications. It's health and safety factors alone will save lives and directly affect health & insurance costs in the near future. HHO & this generator will change the world.
grimelab @ 7:56 am
What the fuck is HHO gas? There's no such thing, they're trying to deceive people with make-believe chemicals.
ramaswami2003 @ 7:56 am
I hear is good But in practise it is difficult to execute to develop HHO through electrolysis process and directly feed into usage in automobile. Because the get result it need six months for economy study verses investment. Unless with less D.C power if ale to get acceptable output of HHO and result achived to acceptable limit it is rather long way to go this development. In fact only 0.5% automobile users are have knowledge about this HHO concept not accepted by majority
imanerd36 @ 7:56 am
DENNIS KLINE DID NOT INVENT HHO GAS. I'm serious, I hate this man. I would be very happy if he would say that he was *investing* it, but he is claiming he invented it. He is a lier and a deceiver. Don't believe me, check his declined patent applications. It was invented by Dr. William Rhodes in the 1960s and further developed by Yull Brown and George Weissman. FUCK YOU DENNIS KLINE!
Saromatae @ 7:56 am
You might just as well say that acetyline is a scam as it too requires more energy than you get out of burning it also. Its not about getting more energy out of the reaction it is about making energy into a usable and convenient source.
Did you actually watch this video before commenting?
Saromatae @ 7:56 am
I don't see here that they are claiming to get more energy out of this than is put in. The ingenious part of this welder is that it doesn't store HHO, it creates it as needed from water. Yes you need a good electrical supply to create the gas but that is easier than lugging around two large bottles of gas like a traditional welder. In a workshop that is ideal. The only disadvantage is that it needs to be plugged in, older welders don't and can be used in remote locations.
Wcoltd @ 7:56 am
the reason is it's not in the news is because it is not very good.
as a function of volume, the energetic potential of liquid hydrogen is only a quarter of the combustion potential of gasoline., dispite being far more costly and inneficient to produce and transport.
HHO electrolysis is a flawed device for use in a car
it's far more likely the future of transportation will be based on the electrical grid.
I have huge doubts that HHO gas at STP could better the fuel milage by better than 10%.
evhspence999 @ 7:56 am
at 1:33 water is written as HO2 haha theres two oxygens they messed up
fuzzyr @ 7:56 am
Bottom line: it's a scam. It requires more energy to convert water to component gases than is obtained from burning the gas. You don't get something for nothing.
fuzzyr @ 7:56 am
The downside is that it requires MORE energy to separate water into component gases. Bottom line: it's a scam.
TheKasari @ 7:56 am
it does increase your gas milage.
TheKasari @ 7:56 am
it is dummy
HWCWTD @ 7:56 am
If this were as good as it sounds wouldn't it be in the news? Surely it would be all over the net too?
appletime101 @ 7:56 am
haha all these guys need to get some secondary or post secondary education cause if they had any they would understand that it is impossible for this to increase the mileage on your car its basic physics
spike0804 @ 7:56 am
well…i know your retarded…since we were talking about a molecule that has a formula of HHO… which can't exist….and your also wrong….its only OH- ions in a basic solution douche bag….
otherwise at the anode its 2H2O —-> O2 + 2H+
jperrelet @ 7:56 am
Nah im a physicist….
AT THE CATHODE:
2 H+ ions pick up electrons making H2 gas.
AT THE ANODE:
4 OH− ions combine making O2 gas.
THE OVERALL REACTION:
2 x H2O –> 2 x H2 + O2
Yeah… you can do that, it's called electrolysis for a reason
cruso24d @ 7:56 am
i would like to see him cut stainless steel pipe 316/ss. we normally use a plasma cutting device for that!
burnbabyburn692 @ 7:56 am
Free energy? As if it does not cost anything to build a wind turbine or a dam. Electrolysis isnt anything new. Get an education for crying out loud. I have an engineering degree and this is retarded for so many reasons. From a chemistry and thermodynamics approach there is no enery gain from doing this.
burnbabyburn692 @ 7:56 am
Or they got an actual education. Take a chemistry or thermodynamics class. There are actual scientists working on making hydrogen fuel a reality. I am working on next generation nuclear powerplants (NGNP) to generate the huge amount of electricity that would be required to use hydrogen seperated from water. This isnt free energy. Get an education!
DjGisME @ 7:56 am
what do you think when u have 7.2 liter engine you crazy power hungry mad man - buy yourself smaller car and you will save money then - 1.8 engine with 1l of HHO can do approx 80 miles as oppose to 40 - 100% mileage increase with HHO
…listen careffuly
never dispose hho generator liquid into the sink as it's chromates causes cancer THEREFORE
Store it in sealed BARREL or CONTAINER until recycling centres available - plastic preferable don't store waste liquid in metal container
spike0804 @ 7:56 am
yeah…you can't do that…obvously you have never had chemistry….hydrogen cannot bond to itself and then have that hydrogen bond to oxygen, there aren't enough electrons to go around
jperrelet @ 7:56 am
H20 is 1 molecule.
HHO is a H molecule and a H0 moleule.
jperrelet @ 7:56 am
WHo told you that? That's not true…
proximusredsea @ 7:56 am
nope, there's CH3COOH and you can't write it as "CH3CO2H"