HHO gas part two (alternative to fossil fuels)

Dears,

I have an Audi A4 1.8T. and i'll be delighted to share it, in the name of science ! I'd like to equip it with these "few modifications" 5:11
Just tell me the aprox. amount of cash, and the company which offers that technology.

Best Regards
P.Tenev, Bulgaria

You know, there's these things that, in at least half of the United States, are called Hydroelectric Plants. They use moving water to create electricity.

Seriously, stop trying to be a smart-ass. You're terrible at it.

Allow me to put an end to the arguement. Watch this video for ABSOLUTE proof that it is IMPOSSIBLE for HHO to increase miles per gallon. Good stuff.

watch?v=5G9DAmt_jLk

you don't need gas to produce electricity dude.

Where do you buy the generators from?

They mean welding gas, not gas for energy production. This is normally bought in a tank, and as such has a finite volume; when the tank is empty it needs to be refilled. If you're generating your welding gas from water and electricity, both of which come out of a hole in the wall, you don't need to go and buy some more.

3:32 "we never worry about running out of gas, pour a little water, as long as you can flip a switch, you can have all the gas you want!" YOU CANT FLIP A SWITCH WITHOUT GAS TO PRODUCE ELECTRICITY!

Incredible. To think that we've been missing out on revolutionary eighteenth century technology this whole time. Oh wait.

oh its so anoying saying "this very unique HHO gas", sounds like they discovered a new element.

thats right, but you cant get a higher efficiency then 100%.
the advantage is that electric energy, that is easily available, is transformed by water into a form of thermal energy, that it is easy to cut, … with.
you can do that with gas in bottles the same way, but there are costs for compresing filling and delivering the gas-bottles.
you dont have these costs with a local HHO generator.
and the generator cant fly through your factory like a bottle with chopped of head

Using this in cars is actually a pretty good idea.

You're not using the electricity created from this. You're combining the HHO with gasoline in the combustion chamber to make a better, more efficient fuel with better mileage and lesser damage on the environment.

it takes a very miniscule amount of electricity to start the "chain reaction" in which the water is fractalized. I think i have read somewhere that the energy output is 700 percent over the amount of energy expelled to start the process. Again the electricity consumption is very nominal.

so where am i supposed to mail the check…..

I think the trick is being able to break water into H and O while using much less energy. Other than that it's just using the energy stored in water, together with a few beneficial side effects, no physics laws are broken.

The real problem is: There are too many people on earth. And too many people take fossil fuels for granted. And too many people are lazy.

So: they produce a mixed-gas consisting of h2 o2 and h and o radicals. They use electric energy for that. Then they recover the energy by burning it.
How does using electricity from the coal-powerplant help reduce CO2 eission?
Apart from the fact, that the gas is created on the spot and there are no storage problems, there is nothing different to a normal h2 o2 torch, fueled by bottles of the respective gasses.
As I understnad their claims the procedure violates the first law of thermodynamics.

Using this technique in vehicles is just stupid.

That vehicle simply electrolytes water (H2O) into hydrogen(H) and oxygen(O) using electricity. That way you need no container for the gases.

Then it makes the oxygen(O) react with the hydrogen(H) going back into water (H2O).

Practically you would need more energy electrolyting the water then you gain from the hydrogen-oxygen reaction. So it's just stupid. You'd probably have a higher efficiency from running the vehicle with plain electricity.

You MUST be crazy. It just can't be using ONLY water.

You can make compressed hydrogen at home. It's actually just sticking two electrodes in water, then taking the hydrogen gas that is created and compressing it.

BTW: You can also see the man has limited chemistry knowledge when he says a hydrogen car exploding is like a hydrogen bomb. Hydrogen bombs use fusion/fission, a hydrogen car exploding would be a combustion reaction. You think the man that "invented" the next great fuel would know that.

BTW: I love HHO. I am against Dennis Kline trying to monopolize the market.

DENNIS KLINE DID NOT INVENT HHO GAS. I'm serious, I hate this man. I would be very happy if he would say that he was *investing* it, but he is claiming he invented it. He is a lier and a deceiver. Don't believe me, check his declined patent applications. It was invented by Dr. William Rhodes in the 1960s and further developed by Yull Brown and George Weissman. FUCK YOU DENNIS KLINE!

For all the HHO doubters out there. Look i have a 8000 watt generator powered totally by water. You want the reason its not used today. There is noway someone can keep getting butt rich from it. Thats why their pushing the fel cell because you still have to pay the piper so to say. Also if you make a major movement to this method the economy would collapse. Before the doubters post get educated and use your head. Ive done it and converting my car right now.

As a torch yeah I will bite that works. For a car is retarded. Have science classes really failed for so many people? WTF? This is basic chemistry kids. If something violates the first of law of thermodynamics you may have something to worry about.

Last time I looked at the JANAF thermodynamic tables the enthalpy associated with water was sh-t. So no water is not comparable to any fuel, the reason why is that it is not a fuel. I will type your response now, "BUT LOOKIE AT THE FLAME! AH DANG IM GOONA GIT ONE FER MY TRUCK! IAM THE WITTLE MAN FIXING TO FITE BIG OIL!"

It just proves that you dont understand the consept! Pure water has more energy per qubiccm than any known liquid fuel.:)