HHO gas part two (alternative to fossil fuels)

So: they produce a mixed-gas consisting of h2 o2 and h and o radicals. They use electric energy for that. Then they recover the energy by burning it.
How does using electricity from the coal-powerplant help reduce CO2 eission?
Apart from the fact, that the gas is created on the spot and there are no storage problems, there is nothing different to a normal h2 o2 torch, fueled by bottles of the respective gasses.
As I understnad their claims the procedure violates the first law of thermodynamics.

Using this technique in vehicles is just stupid.

That vehicle simply electrolytes water (H2O) into hydrogen(H) and oxygen(O) using electricity. That way you need no container for the gases.

Then it makes the oxygen(O) react with the hydrogen(H) going back into water (H2O).

Practically you would need more energy electrolyting the water then you gain from the hydrogen-oxygen reaction. So it's just stupid. You'd probably have a higher efficiency from running the vehicle with plain electricity.

You MUST be crazy. It just can't be using ONLY water.

You can make compressed hydrogen at home. It's actually just sticking two electrodes in water, then taking the hydrogen gas that is created and compressing it.

BTW: You can also see the man has limited chemistry knowledge when he says a hydrogen car exploding is like a hydrogen bomb. Hydrogen bombs use fusion/fission, a hydrogen car exploding would be a combustion reaction. You think the man that "invented" the next great fuel would know that.

BTW: I love HHO. I am against Dennis Kline trying to monopolize the market.

DENNIS KLINE DID NOT INVENT HHO GAS. I'm serious, I hate this man. I would be very happy if he would say that he was *investing* it, but he is claiming he invented it. He is a lier and a deceiver. Don't believe me, check his declined patent applications. It was invented by Dr. William Rhodes in the 1960s and further developed by Yull Brown and George Weissman. FUCK YOU DENNIS KLINE!

For all the HHO doubters out there. Look i have a 8000 watt generator powered totally by water. You want the reason its not used today. There is noway someone can keep getting butt rich from it. Thats why their pushing the fel cell because you still have to pay the piper so to say. Also if you make a major movement to this method the economy would collapse. Before the doubters post get educated and use your head. Ive done it and converting my car right now.

As a torch yeah I will bite that works. For a car is retarded. Have science classes really failed for so many people? WTF? This is basic chemistry kids. If something violates the first of law of thermodynamics you may have something to worry about.

Last time I looked at the JANAF thermodynamic tables the enthalpy associated with water was sh-t. So no water is not comparable to any fuel, the reason why is that it is not a fuel. I will type your response now, "BUT LOOKIE AT THE FLAME! AH DANG IM GOONA GIT ONE FER MY TRUCK! IAM THE WITTLE MAN FIXING TO FITE BIG OIL!"

It just proves that you dont understand the consept! Pure water has more energy per qubiccm than any known liquid fuel.:)

its very well to use this gas for industry applications eg. welding etc. but as for vehicles like cars, planes etc where easily-used energy must be stored as much as possible, its not very feasible to use a gas, because gases have very low densities, ie less moles per unit volume, thus less energy provided in comparison to more conventional liquid fuel. eg. spaceshuttles have those big orange tanks filled with solid fuel, the boosters with liquid fuel.

People are stupid. We dont change unless we have to, so when we have completely destroyed the planet, and have no more Fossil Fuels to use, maybe then we will use HHO or something else.

So-called "HHO" gas is Brown's Gas or oxyhydrogen.

Look it up on wikipedia.

No magic here. It's two parts hydrogen, one part oxygen, which comes precisely from water. No magic. This gaseous mixture is as old as the hills.

It means that they have increase the mileage of the car by 51%

What the hell does that mean, over 51% fuel economy???

Scientifically Sound.
Worth seeing the 7 part Radio Talk show
Search You Tube HHOwater4gas

This vidio was added back in 2007, why hasn't any action been taken to use it???

this is a reply to nodanno

There is none so blind as those who will not see

BOY! What an eye opener. Ray

Why?

true but all you need to seperate water into hydrogen and oxygen is an electric current, which could be had from almost any energy source, including solar. it takes massive amounts of energy to extract, refine, and transport fossil fuels, not to mention all this is done with machines that burn fossil fuels.

kewl

I'm working on a RFG device that will ignite the entire planet.
using the ocean's salt water and common elements as fuel,
I will turn the earth into a small sun.
I'll let everyone know when it's ready

BMW has been running some experimental hydrogen cars for years now, but they are not as efficent as petrol cars.(cleaner they are)
you can't use any more oxygen in the fuel mix, because it would melt the engine.
hydrogen bomb is a nuclear fusion reaction, which is not controlled and has to have previous explosions to get the energy required to fuse atoms. so while a gas tank would make a proper explosion, it would not be a hydrogen bomb.